Fendel
Como dar credibilidade a um livro contra o Estado, se o livro tem o prefácio do Antônio Ermítio de Moraes, tendo e. Ele e sua família vivido DO ESTADO há décadas. Hoje, está feliz com os "governos populares" de Lulla e DiLLma, para quem vende cimento a dar com pau, para a construção de casebres que custam para o pobre, cerca de R$1 mil o M2 (preço de zona sul carioca). Antônio Ermírio é o Abílio Diniz do cimento. A diferença é que Abílio declarou seu amor por Lulla-DiLLma para ver se emplacava a venda do Pão de açúcar para o Carrefour, só que sifu!
Antônio Ermírio de Moraes, em tempos do Estado Máximo de Lulla (só que todo privatizado) ganha rios de dinheiro e quiçá, faz traças financeiras e envio de dólar pata o exterior, com sua financeira. Logo ele que sempre falou tão mau dos banqueiros.
Fora o fato de que, quando precisou do estado para combater comunistas, rezam as notícias que financiou a Operação Bandeirantes, sobrinha da Operação Condor, para ssassinarem de forma clandestina, em nome do Estado, que ele tanto diz abominar.
Cê me desculpa, Fendel! Mas, em matéria de política, você se equivale aos que você chanma de iludidos no caso das Torres Gêmeas.
Antônio Ermírio não presta nem como autor de peça teatral para ele mesmo financiar a montagem (uma espécie de artista onanista).
Não vou ler o livro. Ainda mais nestes tempos que privatizamos tudo para....outros monopólios, só que particulares. prefiro a ineficiência da viúva.
ABS pacientes do
Raymundo
De: Fendel <thomas@fendel.com.br>le e sua famíla
Para: biocom@grupos.com.br; solidariosbrasil@yahoogrupos.com.br; T82@yahoogroups.com; ita81@yahoogrupos.com.br; menteestrategica@grupos.com.br
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 2 de Setembro de 2011 10:56
Assunto: Hoje, faltam 10 dias para o 10. aniv. da implosão programada das torres gêmeas...
| Meus caros ludibriadosoca) Hoje, faltam 10 dias para o 10. aniv. da implosão programada das torres gêmeas... No anexo, uma explicação contundente, traduzida para o português, com os vários absurdos oficiais que contradizem as mais elementares leis fundamentais da física e da química, e que contém alguns links que confirmam as acusações às mentiras oficiais. Segue também vídeo no link abaixo, de 4 minutos da Associação de Engenheiros e Arquitetos, legendado em espanhol, em "comemoração" aos 10 anos da mentira do 9/11: Onde estão os creas? E os confeas? E as escolas de engenharia? E os inmetros? E as abnts? Tudo fachada? Servem apenas para enganar trouxas? E cobrar propinas? E tem quem defende a versão oficial, como o Jorge abaixo, cujos argumentos mais parecem versículos bíblicos... HidroEólicosBioAbraços Professor Fundamental Fendel "Não sei definir o mais filho da puta: - O petraia ladrão mentiroso e assassino, ou - Idem o vaticano pedófilo." (Thomas Renatus Fendel) lulla - um bandido: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkhZ81tX32M& De: Neddo Enviada em: domingo, 21 de agosto de 2011 22:02 Para: Fendel Assunto: Re: Hoje, Domingo, faltam 3 semanas para o 10. aniv. da implosão programada das torres gêmeas...
-------Mensagem original------- De: Jorge USA Data: 30/08/2011 23:53:51 Para: thomas@fendel.com.br; biocom@grupos.com.br; t82@yahoogroups.com; ita81@yahoogrupos.com.br; solidariosbrasil@yahoogrupos.com.br; menteestrategica@grupos.com.br; eduardomoritz@hotmail.com Assunto: RE: Hoje, Domingo, faltam 3 semanas para o 10. aniv. da implosão programada das torres gêmeas... Caro Fendel Lamento publicar la siguiente informacion en Ingles ... no obstante ... no me cabe duda que Ud. domina el idioma: Official investigators for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Nist) in Washington DC, say that what happened on 9/11 to World Trade Centre 7 was unique. Tower 7 was built over a subway and an electricity substation. There were only a few places where foundations could be put down and long beams were needed to take the weight of the building on the east side. The building had to be reinforced on the fifth to seventh floors, and also between the 22nd and 24th floors. Fires were ignited on many different floors at the same time. Crucially fire fighters could not fight the fires in Tower 7. They did not have enough water and focused instead on saving people caught up in the aftermath of the collapse of the Twin Towers. The lead investigator for Nist, Dr Shyam Sunder, told The Conspiracy Files: "Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was normal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors that may have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings." Nist investigators have focused on the east side where the long floor spans were under most stress. They think fires burnt long enough to weaken and break many of the connections that held the steel structure together. Most susceptible were the thinner floor beams that required less fireproofing and the connections between the beams and the columns. As they heated up the connections failed and the beams sagged and failed also. Dr Shyam Sunder says: "It turns out that when you have connections that essentially don't have strength for the loads that they are being subjected to. And you have this massive failure of a column it does not take time. The structure has lost all integrity at that point in time." Investigators think that eventually enough connections were weakened or failed that when a collapse started the whole building fell rapidly. How much fire was there in Tower 7? According to the official account, when the North Tower collapsed at 10.28, WTC 7 was hit by some huge sections of steel from the collapsing Tower and this starts a chain of events that will ultimately lead to the collapse of Tower 7.
A fire protection engineer, Scott Grainger, who has joined Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, told the BBC: "The fires weren't burning on all the floors simultaneously. They were scattered about on the floors. "And as they burn they're going to move through the building so they'll certainly heat up some of the steel in an area. But then as it moves on when it consumes the combustibles there, the chairs, desks, the tables, whatever papers were there. Then there's no longer any source of heat." In the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Nist) interim report issued in 2004 investigators explain that they used photographs and video evidence to determine fire locations and movement within WTC 7. Nist determined that there were fires on floors six through to 13 - except floor 10. And also on floors 19, 21, 22, 29 and 30. Critics of the official report have concentrated on the west, north and east sides of the building, where the fires did not seem severe. However, new testimony and pictures show how the south side was engulfed in smoke. Members of the New York Fire Department who were on the scene at the time told The Conspiracy Files that the building was heavily involved in fire. Lt Frank Papalia of the New York Fire Department told the programme: "We looked at it and said there's so much fire in this building, nobody's going to put this fire out". Photographer Steve Spak, who took some of the clearest images of the damage to Tower 7, told the BBC there was smoke on a lot of floors on the south side of the building and numerous floors had fires. "Through my experience of taking fire photography for the last 30 years, to me that's an indication of extremely heavy fire condition and a dangerous fire condition." Was Tower 7 deliberately destroyed by explosives? The National Institute of Standards and Technology (Nist) has stated: "Nist has seen no evidence that the collapse of WTC 7 was caused by bombs, missiles, or controlled demolition." However, critics of the official account claim the collapse of World Trade Centre 7 was a controlled demolition. According to Richard Gage, an American architect who founded Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the skyscraper was destroyed by a controlled demolition: "Building 7 is the smoking gun of 9/11. It is the most obvious example of controlled demolition with explosives." Steven Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University for two decades until 2006, thinks it looks suspicious: "I saw this building which had never been hit by a plane come crashing straight down. I must admit I was taken aback as a physicist looking at this. We've all seen controlled demolitions I think. They proceed rapidly and straight down. But that's with explosives." They point to Danny Jowenko, a Dutch demolition expert who has been in the business for 28 years, and who when shown footage of Tower 7's collapse said: "That is a controlled demolition... absolutely. It's been imploded. It's a hired job done by a team of experts." But most controlled experts disagree. Mark Loizeaux who runs one of the world's leading demolition companies, Controlled Demolition Incorporated, and who holds the world record for bringing down the largest steel structure, the J L Hudson building in Detroit, says it is simply not possible to bring down a building like Tower 7 which was fully occupied and without anybody seeing or hearing something. The operation would take months to design and months to prepare the structure for the placement of charges: "It's noisy. There's just no way to get around it. You go in, you knock out usually all the walls on the floors where you place explosives, gut them." Mr Loizeaux also told the BBC that you would need to place hundreds of explosive charges along with miles of initiating cable and miles more detonating cord. And you would find evidence left behind of all these explosive charges, blasting caps and tubes. Furthermore says Loizeaux, when you are dealing with charges big enough to bring down a building like Tower 7: "The amount of air that's displaced will break windows easily. "There were a lot of broken windows mainly through impact debris. But I didn't see windows broken on the backs of building, only where debris falling from the Towers struck it. "But come round the back side, no windows were broken there. "They were shielded from debris falling. If explosives of the magnitude necessary to cut the columns in a big building, were detonated the windows all the way round would have been shattered. No way round it." Dr Gene Corley, the lead investigator for the first inquiry by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) told the BBC: "We looked at everything. "Controlled demolition was ruled out because there was no evidence of controlled demolition ... we looked for it, yes, and we found no evidence of controlled demolition." Espero sinceramente amigo Fendel que esto lo ayude a desechar cualquier idea que Ud. pueda tener de una conspiracion. Segun le comente en uno de mis e-mails al respecto ... si la intencion era destruir las torres y culpar al terrorismo ... Para que tomarse el trabajo de reventar 4 aviones? Se podria haber solamente utilizado explosivos y haber culpado igual a los terroristas. Por otro lado ... estan las declaraciones de tres destacados jerarcas de Al Quaeda que reconocen autoria, entre ellos ... Bin Laden. Finalmente .. existe una gran cantidad de fotos de los danos de la Torre 7 y un video del momento del colapso. Con gusto le enviare los links si esta interesado en conocer una verdad distinta de la que Ud. actualmente acepta. Saludos desde Colorado, USA. Jorge A. Carrasco | 
|
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário