RE: [sbis_l] How Medical Device Interoperability Could Save $35B Annually

Bom dia!,

Na verdade, não chego a duvidar. Meus anso de estudo la me mostraram como os americanos realmente medem tudo – internamente nos hospitais, centros, etc.

Nós não medimos. Nem dentro dos hospitais, se vc pedir algum dado (p.e.m queda de pacientes no mes de fevereiro) vc tera que esperar um pouco para saber.

No TIC Saude, 18% dos gestores disseram não saber o percentual que investem em TI no instituto deles. Imagine saber o quanto gastam pela falta de interoperabilidade.

O pior! Num pais que ocupou o 38º lugar entre 44 paises na capacidade de raciocínio lógico, o que fazer???? Entender que temos muita oportunidade pela frente?? Oportunidade em continuar ensinando, repetindo, convencendo, fazendo tudo de novo, de novo,....

 

Abs

Heimar

 

 

From: sbis_l@googlegroups.com [mailto:sbis_l@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Claudio Giulliano
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:48 PM
To: sbis_l@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sbis_l] How Medical Device Interoperability Could Save $35B Annually

 

Será???

 

How Medical Device Interoperability Could Save $35B Annually

 

Written by Helen Gregg (Twitter | Google+)  | March 25, 2014

 

The vast majority (90 percent) of hospitals use six or more types of devices that could be integrated with electronic health records. However, just a third of hospitals integrate any medical devices with EHRs, and those that do integrate an average of three devices, according to a new whitepaper from the ONC and nonprofit research organization West Health.

 

There are significant barriers to device integration — the cost of device integration for hospitals is between $6,500 to $10,000 per bed, and vendors often have no impetus to offer devices interoperable with various EHR systems.

 

However, if these medical devices were all integrated, the healthcare industry could save $35 billion annually, according to the whitepaper.

 

To find the total amount of potential savings, West Health researchers interviewed 30 industry stakeholders about areas in which nonintegrated medical devices could lead to quantifiable waste.

 

Researchers then used current clinical literature to identify the costs associated with the different areas of waste, and found the following:

 

- Quality improvement through reduction of adverse events due to safety could save $2 billion

- Reduced costs of care because of reduced redundant testing could save $3 billion

- Increased clinician productivity due to decreased time spent manually entering information could save $12 billion

- Increased capacity for treatment because of shortened lengths of stay could save $18 billion

 

Link: http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare-information-technology/how-medical-device-interoperability-could-save-35b-annually.html

 

 

Claudio Giulliano

FOLKS e-Saúde

Consultoria e Treinamento

em Informática em Saúde

--
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Seja associado da SBIS!
Visite o site www.sbis.org.br

---
Você recebeu essa mensagem porque está inscrito no grupo quot;Sociedade Brasileira de Informática em Saúde - Lista de Discussão" dos Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um e-mail para sbis_l+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Para mais opções, acesse https://groups.google.com/d/optout.